Math Confirms Foolishness of Climate Alarmism

As usual, any climate talk is just alarmism based on models that will never budge the thermometer, but will open the wallets of the under educated.

Here goes:

The science of climate change often is presented in complicated language that speaks of computer models and the theoretical inputs and outputs thereof and concludes that the globe is on the verge of “boiling.” Well, leave it to three physicists — steeped in calculus and such arcane matters as the behavior of molecules and the nuclear charge of atoms — to simplify the analysis and arrive at a much less alarming determination.

“Straightforward calculations … show that eliminating U.S. CO2 emissions by the year 2050 would avoid a temperature increase of 0.0084 degrees Celsius,” states a brief paper authored by Drs. Richard Lindzen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; William Happer, Princeton University; and William A. van Wijngaarden, York University, Toronto. On the Fahrenheit scale, the value of averted warming is 0.015 degrees.

In short, the amount of warming averted by eliminating CO2 emissions in the United States would be too small to measure. The paper bolsters the position of those who argue that a changing climate is the product of natural forces, that human-induced carbon dioxide emissions can have only a minuscule effect on global temperature, and that CO2 is a valuable plant food and not a pollutant.

Rather than using theoretical assumptions about various factors that are fed into computers, the paper’s calculation relies almost exclusively on “observable data” that are widely accepted and publicly available, says Dr. Happer.

“This is something anybody with a calculator can figure out,” said the scientist, who may be best known for his contribution to a laser-based technology for destroying incoming ballistic missiles as part of the so-called Star Wars program of the 1980s.

The data needed for the math are the number of years until 2050, the amount of carbon dioxide being added to the atmosphere, which scientists regularly measure, and the current concentration of atmospheric CO2, which is approximately 427 parts per million as of June 2024.

The only assumed datapoint is the sensitivity of the atmosphere to CO2 increases. The paper uses a value almost the same as one commonly used “before global-warming alarmism became fashionable.” Even if the value is quadrupled to a number favored by the politically driven Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the amount of warming averted still is only 0.034 degrees Celsius.

story

One thought on “Math Confirms Foolishness of Climate Alarmism

  1. That hot, shiny thing in the sky, sometimes known as Helios, or Amun-Re, or Khephera, or Sol, or Surya, or even Huitzilopchtli and on occasion Kinich Ahau might have somethin to do with this planet’s climate.

    And the atmospheric gas which has BY FAR the greatest influence on WEATHER is dihydrogen oxide, H20 . . . NOT C02 or CH4.

    B’lieve I learned that in science class back around 1952 or so.

    And the environmental impact of mining, processing, installing, and finally disposing of copper, aluminum, cement, lithium, iron, plastic, and other materials for producing or storing energy without fossil fuels is tremendous, especially in the quantities of fossil fuels required to dig up, refine, transport, and apply those things for solar panels, windmills, batteries, and converters is YUGE.

    Like

Leave a reply to bocopro Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.