Headlines: Obama Screws America For His Library, Chicago Teachers Celebrate Cop Killer, The Link Between Vaccines and Autism Clear for 25 Years, How To Save Gen Z and more…….

Scandal

Obama Presidential Center deposits just $1M into $470M reserve fund aimed to protect taxpayers… – He stiffed the country again. It’s also perhaps the ugliest building in America

Obama Foundation Leaves Taxpayers Exposed With Empty $470 Million Pledge – Yes, same story, but different take on it

Chicago Teachers Union Honors Communist Cop Killer – Why we should stop teachers Unions from existing. They don’t help kids. They help themselves

Health

Exposing the Abortion Pill’s Dangers

The Link Between Vaccines and Autism Has Been Clear for Over 25 Years

Europe

Russian Foreign Minister Says Moscow Is in a ‘Real War’ With NATO, and Europe

Celebtards

Mark Ruffalo Claims the ‘Immigrants’ Aren’t the Criminals . . . White People Are – quite possibly the biggest liberal dick in Hollywood

Illegals

Those Two ‘Monsters’ Who Fired on a Texas Baseball Field . . . Guess Their Legal Status

Other

‘Strong Woman’ Realizes She Needs a Man – successful, yet not in control of her emotions, why she’ll never be the leader her strong man will be

Understanding and saving Gen Z to save America – Losers

The Awakening Few See Coming

Climate

Astrophysicist Dr. Willie Soon: ‘It is time to abandon the relentless campaign to vilify carbon dioxide’

2025 Arctic Sea Ice Minimum Nearly Half A Million Square Kilometers More Than 2007

Media

Public Menace: GUESS Which Network Celebrated the ‘Black Liberation’ Cop Killer?

Politics

What the 15 Wealthiest Congressional Districts Have in Common

Do they think we’ve forgotten

Crime

Would-Be Robber Picks the Wrong Couple, Off-Duty Cop Shoots Him Twice in Penn Station

The Media Are Assholes Version Of The Morning Headlines

Illegal Alien Sex Criminal Freed by Biden Beheads Man in Sanctuary City

Scott Adams Explains Why So Many People Thought They Could Cheer for Charlie Kirk’s Murder Without Consequences

NYT Platforms Man Who Called for Murdering Conservatives to Lecture Us on Coexistence

The Biden Regime Smeared Charlie Kirk as a Violent Extremist — Now They Must Be Held Accountable

CBS News Is Still Pretending There is No Motive to Kirk Shooting

CNN Attempts to Shift Blame for Political Violence Away from the Left

Charlie Kirk Tribute Costs TV Host Job

‘Decency Requires You Don’t Speak Ill Of The Dead’: Brit Hume Says Left’s Reaction To Kirk’s Murder Will Backfire

Kid Rock Reacts to Coverage of Charlie Kirk’s Assassination: Mainstream Media is ‘Public Enemy Number One Right Now’ (VIDEO)

Left-Wing Streamer Steven Bonnell, AKA “Destiny” Calls For Conservatives to be Killed More Often So They Will be Afraid to Attend Events Or Speak Out

Iryna Zarutska, Charlie Kirk, and the Democrat Party

Middle East

Mysterious Ancient Papyrus ‘Confirms’ Bible Story of the 10 Plagues

Trump Reveals Hamas Has Moved Hostages Above Ground to Use as Human Shields: An ‘Atrocity’

Europe

Influence Operation? The EU Paid off €600,000 to Friendly Media Outlets Right After European Elections

“I’ve Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before”: 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

Misc

How Much Metal Can $10K Buy?

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Are Broccoli Shots the New Magic Bullet? ‘Nomio’ is Approved by Mads Pedersen and Claims ‘Highly Seductive’ Gains

Paul Krugman Retires From His Career Of Being On The Wrong Side Of Economics

I asked AI to list some of his boners. Here’s what came up

Paul Krugman, a Nobel laureate economist and columnist for the New York Times, has been known to make predictions and argue for certain economic policies that have been proven wrong or controversial over time. Here are a few examples:

  1. Predicting the 2008 Financial Crisis: In the years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, Krugman was skeptical of the severity of the housing bubble and the potential consequences of a housing market crash. He argued that such a scenario was unlikely and that the economy would continue to grow. However, the crisis ultimately occurred, causing a major recession and exposing the flaws in Krugman’s predictions.
  2. Arguing against austerity: Following the 2008 financial crisis, Krugman advocated against austerity measures and argued that governments should focus on boosting spending to stimulate the economy. However, many countries that implemented expansionary fiscal policies saw mixed results, and some economists argued that a more balanced approach to austerity and stimulus was necessary.
  3. Predicting a “double-dip” recession: In 2010, Krugman predicted that the U.S. economy would experience a “double-dip” recession, with a second downturn occurring after an initial recovery. However, the economy continued to grow steadily, and the double-dip recession never materialized.
  4. Arguing against the effectiveness of Quantitative Easing: Krugman has been critical of the Federal Reserve’s use of quantitative easing, arguing that it was not an effective tool for stimulating the economy. Some economists, however, have attributed the recovery of the U.S. economy in part to the Fed’s aggressive monetary policies.

Here’s what a second engine said:

Paul Krugman, despite his reputation as a prominent economist, has made several predictions that did not materialize as he expected. Here are some specific predictions by Krugman that didn’t come true:

Economic Predictions

  1. 2008 Financial Crisis: Krugman failed to anticipate the severity of the 2008 financial crisis1.
  2. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: In July 2008, Krugman predicted that concerns about a possible collapse of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were “overblown.” Months later, both institutions required massive government bailouts1.
  3. Unemployment Rate: Krugman supported the Obama administration’s stimulus package, which was predicted to keep unemployment below 8%. However, unemployment surpassed 10% despite the stimulus1.

Interest Rates and Fiscal Policy

  1. Zero Lower Bound: Krugman believed that nominal interest rates couldn’t go below 0%. This proved incorrect as some countries experienced negative interest rates2.
  2. Fiscal Austerity: In 2013, Krugman predicted that U.S. budget cuts (the “sequester”) would lead to severe economic damage and possibly a double-dip recession. Instead, the U.S. economy continued to recover2.
  3. Inflation and Deflation
  4. Accelerating Deflation: Krugman’s model predicted accelerating deflation in the face of a prolonged economic slump. In reality, consumer prices rose modestly even as unemployment remained high2.
  5. Price Deflation: In February 2010, Krugman warned of potential price deflation in the near future, comparing the U.S. situation to Japan’s. This did not occur; instead, his preferred measures of CPI turned around sharply within months2.
  6. Oil Prices and Production
  7. Permanent High Oil Prices: In June 2008, with oil at $137 per barrel, Krugman predicted that oil prices were on a permanently higher trajectory. The price of oil collapsed mere months later3.
  8. U.S. Oil Production: Krugman failed to foresee the surge in U.S. crude oil output. He had expressed skepticism about significant increases in oil production, but U.S. field production of crude nearly doubled in the following decade

I’ve never trusted the NYT other than to be on the liberal side of anything, even if it means they were wrong. That he got an award for his economic writings is analogous to Obama getting a Nobel before he did anything other than lie to get elected.

Go away and stop ruining our lives like the rest of the Coastal elites that misunderestimate (Bush-ism) what the real America and real Americans who live in flyover country believe. It’s why most of the country just voted red instead of blue.

Assholes like this need to go away.

Just Another Sign Of How Irrelevant The Legacy Media Has Become

NBC Hails a Shift: ‘Journalists Flock to Bluesky as X Becomes Increasingly ‘Toxic’

Kat Tenbarge, tech and culture reporter for NBC News, filed an online story Saturday, “Journalists flock to Bluesky as X becomes increasingly ‘toxic’Journalists are finding more readers and less hate on Bluesky than on the platform they used to know as Twitter.”

As long as you follow the liberal line, that is.

Tenbarge opened with a journalist and Bluesky fan:

When Ashton Pittman, an award-winning news editor and reporter, first joined the app Bluesky, he said, he was the only Mississippi journalist he knew to be using it. Until about five weeks ago, he said, that was the case. But now, Pittman said, there are at least 15 Mississippi journalists on Bluesky as it becomes a preferred platform for reporters, writers, activists and other groups who have become increasingly alienated by X.

(Pittman sees fascists everywhere he looks these days, including on Twitter, “a chamber that’s increasingly filled with the echoes of Adolf Hitler.”)

The same outlets who refused to see the clear evidence before their eyes of conservatives being throttled on Jack Dorsey-led Twitter are muttering about supposed suppression by Musk.

Since Elon Musk bought Twitter, has turned the platform into an increasingly difficult place for journalists, and many had come to suspect that the platform had begun to suppress the reach of posts that include links to external websites. On Sunday, Musk confirmed the platform has deprioritized posts including links, which was how journalists and other creators historically shared their work. But four journalists told NBC News that after millions of users migrated to Bluesky, an alternative that resembles a pared-back version of X, after the election, they are rebuilding their audiences there, too.

Surprise! Liberal media outlets are finding life more congenial in the BlueSky echo chamber, where there’s little conservative pushback or disagreement.

Story

Birds of a feather flock together. This time it’s in the cesspool. Bluesky will never be X or Truth Social. That is the relevant place to be. Just look at the views and downloads. Just because they are butt-hurt by the election and no one trusts them anymore, they go to a safe place.

That shields the rest of the world from their lies and misreporting during their Trump-hating rants against the USA. We are all better off with them gone.

There is a new paradigm in the media and the alphabet networks and NY Times have been left behind, they just don’t know it yet

‘F*** off’: Tucker Carlson goes nuclear in epic takedown of biased N.Y. Times reporter

Go Tucker, tell the NYT what we all want to tell them.

Tucker Carlson is going nuclear on a New York Times reporter who sought comment about alleged election misinformation by the conservative champion, telling him to “f*** off.”

Carlson shared a text exchange late Monday night from Nico Grant, a San Francisco-based technology correspondent for the newspaper, who indicated: “We rely on an analysis conducted by researchers at Media Matters for America,” a left-wing-minded media watchdog.

Grant said he was working on an article where researchers found 286 videos Carlson posted on YouTube between May and August supposedly containing misinformation, including a clip of Carlson mentioning a “clearly stolen” election.

Grant also sought to know if Carlson was a member of the YouTube Partner Program, and if so, “How often does YouTube demonetize your videos?”

Carlson responded: “So the New York Times is working with a left wing hate group to silence critics of the Democratic Party? Please ask yourself why you’re participating in it. This is why you got into journalism? It’s shameful. I hope you’re filled with guilt and self-loathing for sending me a text like this. Please quote me.”

The reply from the reporter stated: “Thank you for your prompt response. Would you like to address any of the points or questions above?”

Carlson then responded: “Would I like to participate in your attempt to censor me? No thanks. But I do hope you’ll quote what I wrote above and also note that I told you to f*** off, which I am now doing. Thanks.”

More with the actual tweet

The reporter looks like a serious poofter to me

Also, with all that is going on with the Washington Post, LA Times and USA today, credibility in the media has hit rock bottom with most people.