Isn’t it strange how Barry and Michelle Obama are so closely tied—in friendship and lifestyle—to convicted rapists and accused slavemasters and traffickers? That’s the question many people are asking again as we witness the downfall of Obama’s good friend, Sean “Diddy” Combs.
After the U.S. Department of Justice announced the arrest and indictment of Sean Combs, also known as “Diddy,” the music industry has been rocked by a series of major resignations.
These departures are allegedly tied to claims that the infamous “freak offs” were actually organized and funded by some of the most powerful CEOs in the music world.
The truth is, Diddy was one of them—he was part of the Obama orbit, running in the same circles, befriending all the same people. Everyone knew who he was and what disgusting stuff he was up to. So, why did they decide to destroy him? Maybe Mr. Diddy fell off the progressive wagon or threatened to expose the wrong person in some misguided fit of rage. In the end, they likely decided it was safer to bring him down “Epstein-style” than let him keep his power. That’s likely what happened with Harvey Weinstein too, a convicted rapist who Michelle Obama called a “wonderful human being,” a “good friend,” and a “powerhouse.” He probably stepped out of line, and they had to take him down as well.
It’s just very curious how the Obamas were “good friends” with two of the most notorious woman abusers of all time, and they did nothing to stop it.
Even the liberal cat ladies over at Snopes couldn’t hide the truth about Michelle and Harvey.
They were close with Epstein and Weinstein. They are as guilty as the rest of the politicians and celebtards
Delusions of Adequacy 
The PLO in 1988 declares the state of Palestine 24 years after Arab & KGB propaganda embraced the name of Palestine and the UN assumes the right that this terrorist organization’s claim to self determination supersedes the Israeli self determination?
UN 242 based upon Chapter VI and not Chapter VII!!! International bias conceals their interests, alliances, and principles like the puppeteer conceals his control of puppets. So the 140 or more nations who recognize a Palestinian state overrides the Israeli self rule to determine their own national borders. When did Israel become a protectorate mandate territory of the UN?
The PLO declared the State of Palestine on November 15, 1988, in Algeria. This was part of a broader effort to gain international recognition for Palestinian self-determination. In 2012, by the dictate of a plural majority, the UN General Assembly granted Palestine non-member observer state status, and UNSCR 2334 declares this recognition as a Chapter VII decree? Since when do countries who do not even recognize the Jewish state, that they decide the borders of Israel? The UN General Assembly decision by a significant majority of hostile states to the existence of Israel & growing international support for Palestinian statehood, since when does this transfer, according to the ICC, to a Chapter VII UN dictate?
That over 140 countries recognize Palestine as a state, simply does not complicate the dynamics of self-determination claims between Israelis and Palestinians, since that Israel exists as an Independent nation and Palestine exists only as a comic book State!
The PLO’s declaration of a Palestinian state in 1988, this propaganda strategic move to assert Palestinian identity and rights on the international stage does not amount to squat. The 2012 decision by a rogue majority of General Assembly votes to grant Palestine non-member observer state status raise serious questions of UN corruption concerning its legitimacy and effectiveness. Resolution 2334 makes the pretence that Israeli settlements condemned as illegal. Obozo the Clown in the White House, pathetic shoe-shine boy, since when did Chapter VI switch to Chapter VII?
The recognition of Palestine by numerous countries does not automatically transfer sovereign rights or determine borders, especially in light of Israel’s established statehood and international recognition. The characterization of Palestine as a “comic book state” reflects a viewpoint that questions its legitimacy and ability to function as a sovereign entity. This contrasts sharply with Israel’s established status as a recognized nation-state.
The UN General Assembly decision of 2012 reflects deep political biases against the Jewish state, rather than a fair assessment of statehood. None of the hostile UN Resolutions 242, 338, 446, 2334 etc etc etc qualify as Chapter VII condemnations of Israel. Hence they amount to the PLO self declaration of the Palestinian comic book state. The recognition of Palestine by over 140 countries does not equate to sovereignty or the ability to unilaterally determine borders, especially given Israel’s established status as a state. International geopolitical interests do not mean squat in matters of the determination of international law without any signed treaties to back them up!
The Israeli-Balestinian conflict in point of fact really quite moronic simple. This conflict exposes shallow rooted revisionist history political and legal non sense. The so-called international community of nations which vote in the UN farce do not represent valid concerns or grievances concerning the Arab defeats in the 1948 and 1967 Wars!
The UN’s biased involvement, particularly through its anti-Israel resolutions and the General Assembly’s decisions, a subject of criticism and scrutiny. The distinction between Chapters VI and VII simply crucial, as it highlights the UN’s false approach to conflict resolution. While UN political rhetoric declares that it favors negotiation and diplomacy over direct enforcement. By flagrant contrast the UN and ICC rulings pretend they have jurisdiction over Israel and that they can dictate what Israel must do.
The recognition of Palestine by over 140 countries while a significant development, it does not override Israel’s right to self-determination or its established statehood. The international community’s recognition of Palestine exposes hostile foreign states imperialism which seeks to impose a divide and rule unilateral international acknowledgement of Palestinian aspirations and rights, a direct challenge to Israel’s sovereignty.
The recognition of Balestine as a comic book country by over 140 countries does not in fact equate to actual sovereignty or the ability to determine borders. This distinction utterly crucial, particularly given Israel’s recognized status as a sovereign state.
International biases in the UN obscure true interests and alliances of foreign hostile States such as the EU, Russia, and even the US. Suggesting that geopolitical attempts as a forced conversion of Jews unto despised political pawns of the great powers, seeks overshadow legitimate legal rights of the Jewish State who won the 1948 and 1967 wars.
This perspective emphasizes skepticism towards the motivations behind virtually all UN anti-Israel condemnations. The PLO’s declaration of a Palestinian state in 1988, only symbolic. It does not negate Israel’s self-determination or established statehood. The UN General Assembly’s recognition of Palestine as a non-member observer state in 2012, merely a political act that does not change the legal status of either Israel or Balestine. The upgrade of Balestine’s status to a non-member observer state in the UN General Assembly in 2012, simply not equivalent to a Chapter VII decree. As it does not impose enforcement measures on Israel.
The UN General Assembly’s decision in 2012 reflects political biases against Israel, but it does not change the legal status of Israel or Balestine – the imaginary comic-book country. The resolutions passed by the UN General Assembly, while subject to criticism and scrutiny, do not qualify as Chapter VII condemnations of Israel. International geopolitical interests do not automatically translate into valid legal claims or the determination of international law supported by signed Treaties agreed upon by allies.
LikeLike